Forestry & Development E-News

 www.forestryanddevelopment.com                                                                                                                  August  2007

Forestry & Development E-News is an electronic newsletter which reports and comments on regional and international developments in forestry.  If you do not wish to receive Forestry & Development E-News, please click here.

 

 

 

High Level Meeting on Forests & Climate: Australia outlines commitments, World Bank junks FSC bias

 

 

 

Forests and climate change are becoming more prominent in international policy.  At the Australian Government’s High Level Meeting on Forests and Climate, which took place in Sydney during the week ending July 27, Australia made three large-scale commitments to climate change, which will have a direct impact on forestry in the region.

 

Specifically, Australia committed A$10 million to support the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and to promote sustainable forest management in Indonesia.  Australia has also committed to “lead action” to establish a system that will monitor changes in forest cover and carbon levels.  The global system will be funded by the Government’s Global Initiative on Forests and Climate (GIFC).  The Australian Government will invite partner countries to link regional, national and international systems in order to implement a global system.  Read an Australian Government press release here.

 

In addition, Australia has announced it will contribute A$11.7 million (US$10 million) to the World Bank’s new Global Forest Alliance (GFA).  Australia is the first country to contribute to the GFA, a newly established forum administered by the World Bank.  According to a senior World Bank official, the GFA is a new institutional arrangement that subsumes its current forestry partnerships (the World Bank-WWF Alliance, Profor and FLEG).  It will provide for consultation with stakeholders and also raise funds for the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF).  The facility primarily concentrates on Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD), and purchasing carbon credits from developing countries.

 

During the High Level Meeting the World Bank’s forestry advisor and chair of the World Bank-WWF Alliance, Gerhard Dieterle, responded to a question about whether the FCPF would require forestry production in primary, moist tropical forests to be certified as required in World Bank financing, given that the World Bank’s approval of certification schemes has been dictated by the World Bank-WWF Alliance – a bias towards FSC, which WWF co-founded.  The World Bank acknowledged it had received criticism about this policy from the Governments of Australia, the US, Canada and Finland.  Mr Dieterle said the World Bank-WWF Alliance had produced a tool to assess forest certification schemes for generic purposes and that the World Bank ‘are not supporting FSC as such’.

 

The World Bank presentation on FCPF is available here.  The World Bank presentation on REDD is available here.

 

 

 

 

In Other News

 

 

WOOLWORTHS SUPPLY CHAIN PRESSURED BY NGOs

 

30/8/2007: Australian supermarket chain Woolworths has withdrawn tens of thousands of units of tissue and paper products after ceding to NGO pressure over its links with an Indonesian paper supplier.  NGOs have made allegations that a range of products labelled with a “Sustainable Forest Fibre” logo were sourced from unsustainable forestry practices.  Woolworths sources these products from Asia Pulp and Paper (APP), an Indonesian company that has long been a target of NGOs such as Greenpeace.

 

The Australian Plantation Products and Paper Industry Council (A3P) issued a press release in which it called on Woolworths to “re-examine its supply chain”.  A3P has urged consumers to “buy products with fibre sourced from sustainably managed plantations certified under internationally recognised sustainable forest management certification schemes such as the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (includes the Australian Forestry Standard) and the Forest Stewardship Council.”

 

Woolworths is now investigating the claims made in the logo.  It has engaged the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) to assist the company to examine its supply chain.

 

 

NZ GREENS TARGET DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, BANKS

 

20/8/2007: The forestry industry in Papua New Guinea (PNG) has again come under attack from environmental activists who are using financial institutions as leverage in their anti-forestry campaigns.  The New Zealand Greens Party has launched an attack against the ANZ Banking Group in a coordinated campaign with the New Zealand Financial Sector Workers’ Union (FINSEC).  The groups have urged a consumer boycott against the bank. The banking group has previously been the target of campaigns from NGOs in New Zealand regarding claims that the bank financed military operations in Iraq.  The action is part of a campaign by NGOs around the world to pressure financial institutions to force their customers to change their practices.

 

The Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) mounted a campaign against ANZ in Australia. It has complained that ANZ has clients in the forestry industry with practices to which ACF objects. Despite this, ANZ has just been rated by the Dow Jones Sustainability Index as the world leader for sustainability in the financial sector.

 

 

NEW ZEALAND MOVES ON ILLEGAL LOGGING POLICY

 

7/8/2007: The New Zealand Government has announced that it will consult industry, importers and retailers on a new proposal to introduce rules on the legality of imported timber products.  New Zealand’s Minister for Forestry, Jim Anderton, stated that “illegal logging is costing New Zealand wood producers hundreds of millions of dollars in the global marketplace”.  The announced consultation is foreshadowed in the New Zealand’s policy to address illegal logging and associated trade, which was approved in 2006. The New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) has published a report entitled Implications for the New Zealand Wood Products Sector of Trade Distortions due to Illegal Logging.  The report states that trade distortions due to illegal logging cost the New Zealand forest industry NZ$266 million a year in lost revenue, and that illegal timber harvesting depressed wood product prices around the world.  The report specifically identifies PNG, the Solomon Islands, Myanmar, Laos, Viet Nam, and Thailand as countries exporting “suspicious wood”, citing unsubstantiated claims by NGOs such as Greenpeace.

 

 

ILLEGAL LOGGING BILL INTRODUCED TO US SENATE

1/8/2007: An illegal logging Bill has been introduced into the US Senate. The ‘Bipartisan Combat Illegal Logging Act’ follows the introduction of a Bill against illegal logging tabled in US Congress in March of this year.  The Bill's text is in many ways identical to the earlier Bill that was introduced in March this year.

 

The Lacey Act has been identified by anti-logging groups as a potential model for legislation.  Submission of a Bill to the US Senate is no indication of a likely change in policy by the Administration on any subject.  Submitting a Bill with no expectation it will be passed is a common way of drawing attention to an issue.

 

 

REVISED AUSTRALIAN FORESTRY STANDARD GAINS RECOGNITION AS AN AUSTRALIAN STANDARD

 

The Australian Forestry Standard (AFS) has been fully recognized as an Australian Standard following a comprehensive three-year review process. The AFS is the standard for forest management under the Australian Forest Certification Scheme (AFCS).

 

A number of changes were made to the Standard from its 2003 version, which was recognised by Standards Australia as an ‘interim standard’. The revised standard will not certify plantation forestry on cleared native forest land. It also provides greater transparency for the certification process and a greater regard for social and indigenous interests in forest management.

 

The AFCS is endorsed by the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes (PEFC). A related press release issued by AFS Limited is available here.

 

The AFS, like PEFC, follows world’s best practice for governance arrangements. WWF refused to participate in the preparation of the AFS and its forest certification associate, FSC, has lobbied unsuccessfully against the AFS and PEFC among governments in Europe.

 

 

 

 


| Forestry & Development Website | Contact |

 

 


  
 

You have permission to forward this email newsletter to other interested persons provided it is passed on in its entirety.

 

Forestry & Development E-News is published monthly by ITS Global (http://www.itsglobal.net/).

ITS Global are accredited assessors for the International Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes (PEFC)

 

Questions and feedback can be sent to forestrydevel@bigpond.com

If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter, please click here.

© 2007. All rights reserved